Psychodynamic Theory and Person Centerd Counselling Essay

Counselling takes place when a counsel find one egotisms a thickening in a private and confidential setting to explore a difficulty a customer is having, distress they whitethorn be experiencing or perhaps their dissatisf performanceion with vitality, or loss of a sense of educational activity and purpose. It is always at the request of the leaf node as no wholeness flowerpot properly be sent for counselling. (Counselling cardinal) By listening the guidance faeces begin to perceive the difficulties from the clients point of run across and tail end help them to see things more clearly, possibly from a variant perspective. Counselling is a way of enabling choice or chummyen or of reducing confusion. It does non involve giving advice or directive a client to take a particular course of action. Counsellors do not judge or exploit their clients in any way. (Counselling central). The 2 primary(prenominal) therpaies within counselling that I will focus on comparing o n contrasting atomic number 18 mortal centerd counselling. per centum is a form of talk-psychotherapy develop bypsychologistCarl Rogersin the 1940s and 1950s. The goal of PCT is to suffer clients with an opportunity to develop a sense of self wherein they can realize how their attitudes, happenings and behavior atomic number 18 macrocosm negatively affected and submit an effort to adjust their true positive potentialIn this proficiency, healers bring to pass a comfortable, non-judgmentalenvironmentby demonstratingcongruence(genuineness),empathy, and arrogant positive turn over toward their clients while using a non-directive approach.This aids clients in finding their cause solutions to their problems. Secondly Psychoanalysisis apsychologicalandpsychotherapeutictheory conceived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud. Psychoanalysis has expanded, been criticized and developed in different electric charges, aroundly by ab come forth of Freuds colleagues and students, such asAlfred Adler,Carl Gustav JungandWilhelm Reich, and later by neo-Freudians such asErich Fromm,Kargonn Horney,Harry Stack SullivanandJacques Lacan.The basic tenets of psychoanalytic therapy include the following beside the transmitted constitution of individualality, a individuals development is unconquerable by events in early childhood, human behaviour, experience, and cognition atomic number 18 largely determined by irrational drives, those drives are said to be largelyun sensible. This main aim of this assignment will be taking twain person centred and psychoanalytic therapy and critically comparing them I will do this by giving an overview of the two therapies how they were developed, the dogmas they lie upon, what their relationships are base on.We will then(prenominal) look at how they are similar and also how they differ by looking at the skills used and how they operation as therapies to come to twain do the same thi ng which is to help a client catch an issue in their life. Person centred therapy is base on the idea that military man feed a drive to grow towards their potential and will act with the surmount interest to themselves, if they are provided the right atmosphere (Mcleod,2008). The direction of therapy is guide by the client with the support of the healer. The client is always the expert on themselves if they are provided with the right atmosphere for self-actualisation to occur.The central component being the client knows best the client knows where it hurts the most. The proponents main motive is to relate to the client in such a way that he or she can find thither sense of self direction. Carl Rodgers was the soften of person centred therapy. The development originate in from Rodgers experiences of being a client and take to the woodsing as a counsellor (casemore) Rodgers didnt like the view of behaviourist that humans were organisms that react to stimuli and developed h abits from learned experiences.Therefor in his work as a counsellor became increasingly uncomfortable with being the expert so began to develop a different view of what clients learned to experience in counselling, empathy congruence and unconditional positive figure. Rodgers proposed that human beings were always in the process of becoming earlier than being in a fixed state. As humans we have the captivity to develop in a basically positive direction given the right conditions.Thats not to say that he impression great deal are not sometimes cruel or foul tho every person has the tendencies towords strong positive direction. Rodgers proposed that when the conditions were appendage promoting an individual(a) could develop into a fully functioning person. Rodgers described his approach as a basic philosophy rather than a simple technique which empowers the individual and leads to personal and social transformation, grounded in empathetic taste being non-judgemental and con gruent.For this reason the person centred approach is often seen as touchy note relation and seen as soft skilled that lacks structure, sometimes said as a way of preparing the road for real therapy. However it does have a clear theory of self, the creation of distrees and the tehraputic process. Its aims are transformational and asks the counsellor to be a human and transparent be real(langridge). Freud is regarded as the bringer of modern psychology, developing psychoanalysis. The therapy is based on the idea that a colossal deal of the individual behavior are not within conscious control.Therefor the main emphasis is to help the client get to the deep author of the problem often thought, to stem from childhood. Based on the principle that childhood experiences effect our behavior as adults and effect out view processe, Freud belived that these thoughts and feelings can become repressed and may manifest themselves as depression or other negative symptoms. The client is able to reveal unconscious mind head thought by talking freely aboput thought that enter their mind the analysis will attempt to interpratate and contribute sence of the clients experiances.Deeply burtied experiances are explicit and the opportunity to share tehase thoughts and feelings can help the client work finished thease problems. Clients are asked to try and transfer thougts and feelings they have towords people in their life on the analyst this process is called transfernace the success depends on how the analysats and client work together. Psychoanalysis can be life changing if successful howver virtually 7 years of therpay is needed to discover the full unconcious mind . continuous school terms provide a setting to explore there thoughts and make sence of them. psychoanalytic therapy is based on freuds work of pychoanalysis but less intensive it is found to be bennaficial for clients who want to understand more about tehmselves and useful to people who feel tehir prob lems have affcted them for a long period of time and need reliving of emotional disstress. Through deep exploration client and therapist try to understand the inner life of the client. Uncovering the uncocncious needs and thoughts may help the client understand how their past experiances affect their life today.It can also help them to work out how they can live a more fulfilling life. Person centred counselling and psychoanalytic therapy are twain get rid of springs of two great minded people Sigmund Freud and carl Rodgers the originators of these two approaches. Freud based his theoretical account on his medical background , Rodgers was influenced by excistential phillosphy were the person is there central role in their growth and change. Some similarities can be emaciated from a comparison betwewen the two models they both(prenominal) want to widen the concioussness but this is done in different means.Psychonalsis aims to make the unconscious conscious and by doing this help s the person gain controle over their thought and feelings. And the person cneterd approach helps the client to overcome a state of incongruence whilst psychoanalytic objective is two prove the repressed childhood experiances. The person centerd works through the concioussness by guidance on the here and now. Kahn (1985) compares the term incongruence with psychoanalytic defence mechanism repression. To him both are the same thing but different versions.Both continue the person from being aware of his their accept feelings the onluy diffrnece being that Rodgers belives by imputing the tenderness conditions of Two persons are in Psychological contact, The first, whom we shall term the client, is in a state of incongruence, being vulnerable or anxious,The second person, whom we shall term the therapist is congruence or integrated in the relationship,The therapist experiences unconditional positive regard for the client. The therapist experiences an empathic understanding of the c lients internal frame of extension service and endeavours to communicate this experience to the client.The communication to the client of the therapists empathic understanding and unconditional positive regard is to a minimal mark achieved. Then if thease are imputed incongruence will be shifted and psychoanalytic belive through reading of childhoon events repression can be acchived. Both psychoanalytic and person centred involve empathy that is employ to client and therapist, enabling the client to gain new understanding and campaign away from distress and towards harmony with self and others. Therefor potentially both try to increase acumen and strength towards the self.Other areas that overlap are also evident simple areas such as setting bounderies, along with assessment for therapy. From the first minuite of contact both persons become aware of their own and others aims, values and lifestyle by empathic attending. Both types of therapist are warm and open minded and accep ting. In both therapies the therapist is bidden to provide a non judgemental respectful attitude towords the client. Both also share a commitment to the use of silence beliving it is an effective besidesl for therapy commiting to listening without impediment.The similarities are strongly guided by personal growth and development both have the interest of promoting self-reflection of the client. Their interest is to promote self-reflection of the clirnt. The relationship is very definitive in both and the main reason for this is to gain a beter insight and clearer understanding of the client. The aim is to build a relationship built on trust honesty and reliance on one another. The relationship is significant in both therpays as without a tight relationship there is no ground work in place for the client to feel safe to explore.Both models encourage the client to relase emotions and it is through tehase that empathy can be experienced. On the other hand psychoanalytic theory stres ses the importance of unconscious procedures and sexuality as the key terms for a deep understanding of the human pychopathology. Freud thought that dreams were the best way to explore the unconscious since they are disquised as the id whishes repressed by the ego in order to relief valve from awareness. The goal of counselling to Rodgers is the congruence of personality acchived when the self gains access to a variety of experiances. he need for self actualization can only be atteneded to once counsellor creates an atmosphere of unconditional positive regard and empathic understanding. There are considerable diffrences amongst the two approaches ialthough state that they both create a strong knitted relationship between client ancd counsellor . person centers counselling the counsellor takes on a non directice role more like a companion rather than a leader and the client takes lead of the session were as psychodynamic counsellors take more of an authority figure in the relations hip.Person centred firmly believes that the 6 snapper condition are necessary for change. Hoewever psychodynamic use of transference is to make interlingual rendition to the client for effective change. Person centred would see using transference would not create a genuine relationship between counsellor and client. unmatched of the central themes in person centred is the emphasis on the present behaviours of the client. Psychodynamic focuses on the past and how it determines the present behaviours.Pychodyanmic counsellors choose to remain neutral during a session as this encourages transference a major(ip) tool in psychodynamic therapy. McLeod (2004) points out that in person centered counselling, questions are only asked to clients when necessary and may also answer questions if asked by clients, as this was supports to create the quality of the relationship. This over again differs to the way Psychodynamic counsellors work as asking questions are pivotal during therapy as thi s elps to explore and build up relevant material, furthermore, it would be unlikely for a psychodynamic counsellor to answer any personal questions by the client and preferably try to figure out why the question is significant. Although both see the relationship as crucial each therapy maintains a diferent way to responding to the client attitudes and values. for instance defences and transferance excist in both forms but handled in different ways. For person centerdit is a requirement that the core conditions are stimuiltaneous for the therapist thease core conditions repersent an openess to self experience and to the experience of another.Rodgers belived counsellors should be egalitarian in their meetings with clinets and a major diffrence concerns pychodynamic interpretations. Appearing as all knowing and going beyond what is un-concious based mostly on theory rather than a clients spacific experiances. Thorne (1996) states that pychodynamic therpay may go to early in interprat ation to make sence to clients Pychodynamic interpratation specifically concerns the naming of the unconcious for causeing problems that the clinet may be having.Only in the hermanutic meaning does the word interpratation make sence of things Hermeneutics applies to all persons who make sense of all situations, whereas psychodynamic interpretation in the narrow sense is the most specific ingredient of psychodynamic therapys efforts to make positive changes for clients. All in all psychodynamic approaches are based on freuds work based on the unconscious of the ID ego and superego which emphasis on sexual aggression.Person centerd is based on the belief that humans have unique qualities for freedom and growth beliving that we are beyond being controlled by ID ego and superego not controlled by sexual urges. The similarities between both approaches promote and guide the idea of mount and development. There main interest to promote self reflection and awarenss for the client in order to do this they effectively use communication.Both approaches are the result of hypothesis the main diffrences lie at the foundations and what is belived to work best however sometimes they meet for what may be the best too to use at the time of hearapy. prehaps what makes any thrapy work is the belief that they can work if the client wants it to work there emotional needs and expectataions I belive that theory used does play a a very cardinal role but it is the client who has the ability to change which ever root of therapy they take they can change no matter how they recive therapy weather it be in a humanistic approach or psychodynamic because if they expect it to work it will so maybe I am more for the person cneterd view as I belive that self actualisation and awarenss is very important to be able to facilitate growth.