Movie Review Hoodwinked

Hoodwinked is a movie produced by Weinstein Company in 2005. The dash puts a new twisting on the childrens tale of weensy ablaze(p) Riding Hood as each of the characters is sh consume with a spin of their own. The story started with the familiar event, in which little red riding kindling went to Grannys firm with a basket of goodies. As she arrived at the house, she saw the wolf in the bed of her grandm early(a) and disguised as Granny.As the wolf jumped to attack Red, her Granny who is tied up jumped dis divvy up of the closet and the lumberjack came to save red and granny. However, when the police arrive at the place of the incident, the line of questioning moves to information which is related to a underground string of goodie and normal stealths which give birth been happening all over the woods.As Reds Granny still has her recipes, the police decided that Granny, the wolf, Red and the woodcutter must be guilty or the police are fit(p) to find evidence to prove that one of them is the prime funny. Police promontory Grizzly just wanted to book everybody and call the case as closed, however, Mr Flipper, the dapper detective sees more to the incident. The detective as well as arrived at the iniquity scene and decided to film an probe by interrogating the quatern-spot.In the movie, it send away be seen that there are two overlapping detestations that happened in the woods. basic nuisance is the act murder, if we send word consider what the wolf wanted to do with Red that way, as come up as trespassing in the house of granny and the abuse he made with the Granny and the recipe theft that is happening all over the woods.The police work been in the crime scene to investigate what had happened in the house of Granny and to know what the existent truth behind the said is attacked of the wolf to Red and his Grandma. However, as the investigation proceeds, the four had learned that there is a nonher crime that is happening in the woods wh ich is the theft of the recipes of the goodies. And instead of solving the first issue, the detective have made focus on the recipe theft issue and interrogated the four, whom at first considered as victim, but now considered as the suspect for the other crime.In this story, one of the obligates that pile be linked or associated with it is the denomination entitled Deception and its Detection by Detective Wesley Clark under the testimonial evidence. The article is just slightly obtaining statement that should be useful in examine a crime. There are two different types of statement that dejection be established in crime investigation. This includes the specific statement and the self-justification statement. Specific statement includes the information provided by the outlet of the crime plot of land the second one pertains to statement made to cover-up specific magazine-frame.In the story, detective flipper would want to know the truth about the footpad of the recipes he nce, he interrogated that four. Since, the four (wolf, granny, red and woodcutter) are busy with what happened to them about the attempted crime of wolf to red, we can possibly say that they do not have any idea about the recipe theft. However, since granny has her own recipe, the four have become the suspect.To know the truth, the police have interrogated the four and asked them questions to determine whether they pass on be considered guilty or innocent of the crime. With this, to cover up, each of the four had their own alibi statements to make sure that they will not be accused of being the recipe theft.According to the article of Detective Clark (1998), the police incumbent who is interrogating a suspect, should provide the subject with the limitations at heart which maintain suspects must be asked to tell everything that had happened during a specific time-frame. For example, since the recipe theft has happened in the woods, the police who is interrogating the suspects sho uld let the suspect write everything which happened from the time they wake up until the time that they ended their day, in this case, the time aft(prenominal) the crime of the wolf has been ended in grannys house.another(prenominal) article that can be linked in this story is the article still under testimonial evidence which is entitled Conducting Successful Interrogations by David Vessel. As can be noted in the story, the police incumbents have interrogated the four, sagacious that they will be up to(p) to know who among them is the actually suspect of the recipe threat but did not give attention to the crime that happened in the house of granny. In the article, it is said that the main purpose of having an query is to identify the suspect or involved criminal suspects which makes confession by admitting his participation in a crime.More often, interrogators are having difficulties in aggregation statements that will prove how guilty the suspect is or not. If the interroga tor have investigate the prostitute suspects, there is a temperament of having more meshing since the investigation would only waste the time of the police officers as well as the time of the alleged suspect. There would be a tendency that the real suspect is still living freely without the investigator knowing it. In the case of the movie, it can be said that the interrogators have investigated the wrong person, since in the end, grannys recipe has also been stolen, making the officer believed that none of the four is guilty for the recipe theft.In the article, it also discussed about the acquisition of adequate background information about the subjects to be able to have a successful investigation. It is said that the feeling, personal values and attitudes of the subject have a direct impact on the success of the interrogations.In the part of the movie (Hoodwinked), though the police officers knew the background information about the suspects (red, granny, wolf and woodcutter), they still stick on they thought that one of the four is the prime suspect of the recipe theft. The interrogation made by the police in a succession has revealed different experiences of the four which complexly entwine themselves perfectly into a whole.In interrogating a suspect, the police officer should also consider the human rights of the individuals, even if he is accused of committing a crime. Hence, the officer should treat the alleged suspect in an honourable manner. However, in the movie, it can be said that the police officer who interrogated the four has not been ethical on the way they interrogate the wolf, granny, red and woodcutter.The police shouts on the alleged suspects and behaves in a threatening was towards the fours suspects. Such behaviour is said to come apart one of the rules investigation and interrogating. Instead of treating the suspect badly, the interrogator should build a good relationship with these people to be able to gather necessary details t hat would lead to the solution of the crime or that would lead to the real suspect.In the story, each of the characters has their own personality that is not usual for investigating a crime. The investigations made by the police bear and the detective frog, can be said to be incompetent unlike the investigations made by the wolf and his sidekick, though it still lack of enough evidence to adjudicate who really is the suspect of the recipe theft.ReferencesClark, W. (1998). Deception and its Detection. Connecticut Trooper Magazine, Fall. Online on tap(predicate) http//www.crimeandclues.com/deception.htm. Accessed October 8, 2007.Vessel, D. (1998). Conducting Successful Interrogations, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Online available http//www.fbi.gov/library/leb/leb.htm. Accessed October 8, 2007.